彩多多|彩多多

来源：彩多多2021-09-16 17:48

彩多多

今天19:50，浙江卫视美好跨年夜致敬每个全力以赴的你******

今天19:50，浙江卫视美好跨年夜致敬每个全力以赴的你

　　随着2022年接近尾声，属于2023的新篇章也终于即将开启。今日， 2022-2023浙江卫视美好跨年夜节目单发布，为迎接新年的喜庆气氛再添一把火热。今年浙江卫视美好跨年夜，围绕“向美好，新篇章”，邀请行业代表、青春榜样和表演嘉宾共同用一首首承载记忆的作品致敬新时代奋斗者，让更多观众感知平凡中蕴藏着的伟大力量。

　　2022-2023浙江卫视美好跨年夜的舞台，不止是灯光与旋律交错的文艺空间，更是心与心交汇的情感空间。它将美好、奋斗、传承、坚守等精神元素串联起来，回应社会关切，凝聚情感共鸣。近日，美好跨年夜发布了一组“没有一个冬天不可跨越”主题海报，致敬那些为了更加美好的明天而持续拼搏的时代奋斗者。穿梭在大街小巷的外卖员来去匆匆传递三餐温暖；交警在每一条平稳畅通的道路上风雨无阻守护前行；坚守在接诊大楼的医务工作者处理着百位数计的排号，为每一个生命护航……每一个平凡的个体虽然微小但却蕴含非凡的力量，无数微小的个体最终将汇聚成这个时代最美的注脚。

今天19:50，浙江卫视美好跨年夜致敬每个全力以赴的你

　　浙江是中华优秀传统文化汇集的“非遗大省”，是宋韵文化集大成之地。近年来，浙江卫视不断深入挖掘优秀的传统文化，坚持贯彻ZMG“以传播力先行推进高质量发展”理念，用电视语言打开浙系传统文化之窗、讲好中国故事，润物无声地将“最具美好感的视媒体”形象种在了无数观众的心里。今年美好跨年夜舞台上，观众可以从申遗成功的中国传统制茶技艺及相关习俗感受传统文化的厚重，还可以欣赏古筝、竹笛、二胡等各展所能演绎“民乐巅峰对决”，更有首位宋韵数字人“谷小雨”惊喜亮相展示宋韵文化的别样风采……浙江卫视美好跨年夜为传统文化搭建舞台，将美学精神与人文故事巧妙结合，让传统文化在新时代绽放。

今天19:50，浙江卫视美好跨年夜致敬每个全力以赴的你

　　本场晚会还邀请华语乐坛的多位实力唱将，组成了触达老中青视听审美的顶级音乐舞台，以经典传唱的艺术方式贯穿起过去、现在和未来。杨丞琳和和童声合唱团演唱《一千零一个愿望+暧昧+年轮说》与张栋梁的经典联唱《小乌龟+北极星的眼泪+当你孤单你会想起谁》各自自带“回忆杀”的怀旧组曲足以让人一秒回忆起青葱岁月。GAI周延和孟佳将用《华夏》与《东方》演绎出不同视角的国风中华魂；希林娜依•高联动唢呐版《大圣》可谓新意十足；郑云龙与宋轶的《水调歌头》会与以往的版本有何不同？此外，范丞丞、董思成等歌手也将带来各自的最新舞台，万妮达、乃万合作的方言rap串烧则能带领观众感受方言音乐的魅力。更有尚雯婕、唐汉霄、王赫野等实力唱将一同用歌声为这场全年龄向的跨年狂欢增添美好动力。

今天19:50，浙江卫视美好跨年夜致敬每个全力以赴的你

　　浙江卫视多档王牌综艺的嘉宾阵容也已官宣加盟，他们将以怎样的方式唱响一首首承载年代记忆、让心灵穿越时空的歌曲？在《奔跑吧》节目中贡献出梦幻舞台首演后，蔡徐坤这次又将带来全新的《Hug Me》跨年舞台。究竟他们会为观众带来怎样的惊喜？更多精彩，尽在今天19:50顾家家居2022-2023浙江卫视美好跨年夜。让我们在2022年的最后一个夜晚，与浙江卫视一起奔跑向美好，开启新篇章！

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.